Allergy information for: Banana (Musa acuminata; Musa balbisiana(hybrid))

  • Name: Banana
  • Scientific Name: Musa acuminata; Musa balbisiana(hybrid)
  • Occurrence:

    As fruit, juices, syrups, spirits, fruit shakes, fruit cocktails, mixed dried fruits, ice creams, yogurts and other dairy products, puddings, breakfast flakes, energy bars, flavouring powders or essences, confectionery, baked goods, and fruit sauces. Some drugs may also contain banana, as a flavouring additive, as well as some cosmetics.

  • Allergy Information: Banana allergy can take two different forms: one associated with allergy to tree pollen, such as birch, and another type associated with latex allergy. People with birch-pollen allergy can develop symptoms either immediately or up to 1 hour after eating fresh banana or a banana-containing food. Symptoms comprise local reactions in the mouth and throat with itching and inflammation (called oral allergy syndrome, OAS).

    Others develop banana allergy because of the similarity between the allergens in banana and natural rubber latex (e.g. gloves, condoms, balloons) a condition known as the latex-fruit syndrome. Symptoms developed by these individuals comprise generalised urticaria, abdominal pain, vomiting and sometimes life-threatening symptoms. These individuals often develop adverse reactions to chestnut, avocado, mango and kiwi.

    Supplementary information on Banana Allergy

    Banana is the crescent-shaped edible fruit of any of several species of the musaceous genus Musa, which are tropical and subtropical herbaceous tree-like plants. Meanwhile, Plantain specifically refers to the fruit of Musa paradisiaca, a large tropical musaceous plant, eaten as a staple food in many tropical regions. World banana production is about 65 million tonnes per year, concentrated in Africa, Asia, the Caribbean and Latin America, due to climatic conditions. In Europe, estimated yearly consumption varies among countries, from 5 to 10 kg/capita in the Mediterranean area and the Netherlands, to more than 15 kg/capita in Sweden.

    Banana is mainly consumed as a fresh fruit, although a growing variety of processed foods may contain it. These include juices, syrups, spirits, fruit shakes, fruit cocktails, mixed dried fruits, ice creams, yogurts and other dairy products, puddings, breakfast flakes, energy bars, flavouring powders or essences, confectionery, baked goods, and fruit sauces. Moreover, some drugs may also contain banana, as a flavouring additive, as well as some cosmetics.

    Symptoms

    Patients with allergy to banana report adverse reactions immediately after banana consumption, i.e., up to 1 hour after ingestion of either fresh banana or of a banana-containing food. Symptoms are characteristics of food allergy: from mild reactions, such as itching and mild swelling of the lips, tongue, palate and throat, followed by a rapid resolution of symptoms, to itching rush and hives in the skin or mucous swelling, stomach complains, hayfever, constriction of the throat and asthma, or anaphylactic shock – a generalized life-threatening reaction with a large drop in blood pressure.

    How much is too much?

    There is a lack of information on lowest threshold dosages able to induce such reactions but, in a study including food challenges, one patient reacted 5 minutes after a dose of 1.3 g of banana. Anyway, data obtained from clinical histories suggest that, in highly sensitive patients, a very small piece of banana could be enough to trigger reactions.

    Related foods (cross reactivity)

    Banana allergy rarely presents as an isolated disorder, due to cross-reactivity with allergens from other sources. In fact, accompanying allergies to other plant-derived foods are almost the rule. Moreover, most banana allergic patients show associated allergy (hayfever or asthma) to pollens, and/or allergy to natural rubber latex. However, proportions of other food-, pollen-, or latex-associated allergies may greatly vary among different populations, as a function of selection criteria, as well as of pollen or latex exposure.

    Latex is the milky sap of Hevea brasiliensis tree, which is processed to manufacture multiple products, including gloves, condoms and balloons. Latex allergy has been recognized as a very important health problem, due to increase in frequency, and to its ability to induce severe reactions. It is noteworthy that as much as 50% of latex allergic patients may have cross-allergic reactions to certain plant-derived foods (mainly banana, chestnut, avocado and kiwi), a condition known as the latex-fruit syndrome. Allergens responsible for this syndrome seem to be a group of shared plant proteins, to which patients react.

    Interestingly, the content of these allergic proteins in fruits can be increased by certain chemical or physical factors. For example, some chemical products used for ripening bananas, clearly induce allergens, therefore rising fruit allergenicity. These proteins seem to be inactivated by heating, which could explain why some plant foods containing these allergens, but only consumed after cooking, are not associated with this syndrome.

    With respect to banana-pollen allergy, several patterns of associated allergies have been described. Examples for that are the following clusters: ragweed pollen allergy with banana and melon allergies; multiple pollen allergies with banana, melon, watermelon, citrus fruits and tomato allergies; and Platanus tree pollen allergy with banana, hazelnut, peanut and celery allergies. A group of allergens very common in the plant kingdom seem to be responsible for at least part of these cross-reactions, but other allergens may also be involved.

    Who, when, how long, and how often?

    Unfortunately, there is scarce data on the occurrence of banana allergy in different age groups and geographical areas. It seems that, although it is not among the top-5 food allergies, it cannot be considered as a rare allergy, neither in children nor in adults. Certainly, it is much more frequent among specific groups of patients, as for example subjects allergic to latex, to pollens, or to plant-derived foods. In the same way, the development of banana allergy is not known, as long-term follow up of banana allergic patients have not been conducted. Nevertheless, clinical data suggests that patients allergic to banana should assume a lifelong avoidance diet, since – to our knowledge - patients outgrowing banana allergy have not been reported.

    Diagnosis

    With no doubt, clinical history is the best way to detect banana allergy. Patients with immediate reactions after banana ingestion, suggestive of a food allergy (see symptoms), should look for medical advice, and avoid banana consumption until diagnose is established. There are banana extracts commercially available for performing skin tests, as well as assays for blood samples. However, both types of tests currently used do not detect all banana allergic patients. To try to improve diagnostic sensitivity, a prick-prick with banana – skin test with the fresh fruit - can be performed.

    At the same time, neither skin tests nor specific IgE to banana are 100% specific, which means that a positive test only demonstrates reaction of the immune system but not predicts allergy. Therefore, data must be always interpreted according to clinical history. Frequently, and if a not-severe reaction is expected, a controlled oral challenge test (ingestion of progressive doses under close medical supervision) is the only way to discern whether a given patient is truly allergic to banana, but this may present risks in some patients.

    Avoidance

    Patients suspected of being allergic to banana, should completely avoid the ingestion of both fresh bananas and of any banana-containing food, until evaluated. Once diagnose of true banana IgE-mediated allergy is confirmed, patient should follow a lifelong banana-free diet. They should also take care of possible unadvertised exposures, since – unfortunately - this food has not been included in the list of potential allergenic ingredients to be labelled, of the new EU labelling directive (2003/89/EC).

    Due to cross-reactivity, patients considered to be at high risk of banana allergy, as for example subjects allergic to latex, avocado, chestnut, kiwi, melon, or to certain pollens, should be carefully asked about possible previous adverse reactions on banana ingestion. Unless consumption of banana with perfect tolerance is reported by the patient, a banana-free diet should be recommended, until proper diagnosis - on the basis of objective procedures to evaluate clinical reactivity - is made.

  • Other Information:
  • Taxonomic Information: NEWT http://www.ebi.ac.uk/newt/display?search=4641
  • Last modified: 18 October 2006

Reviews (0)

    References (0)

      Clinical History

      • Number of Studies:11-20
      • Number of Patients:>50
      • Symptoms:

        3 patients with urticaria and /or angioedema; 3 patients with rhinitis and/or asthma and 3 patients with oral syndrome (OAS) (Fernandez de Corres et al. 1993) [327]

        2 cases of anaphylaxis and one case with angioedema. (Rodriguez et al. 1993) [492]

        7 patients with anaphylaxis, 6 cases with angioedema/urticaria, 2 cases with vomits, one case with bronchial asthma, and another case with rhinoconjuntivitis (Blanco et al. 1994) [287].

        2 patients with asthma; 2 with rhinitis; 2 with eczema; 3 with urticaria; 2 with angioedema and 2 with OAS (Makinen-Kiljunen 1994) [405]

        5 patients with urticaria; 1 with angioedema and 1 with asthma. (Lavaud et al. 1995) [102]

        4 patients with gastrointestinal disorders; 2 with rhinoconjunctivitis; 1 with edema; 2 with pruritus; 1 with urticaria; 1 with asthma and 1 with conjunctivitis (Delbourg et al. 1996) [42]

        5 patients with anaphylaxis; 3 with local sensitivity and 1 with severe abdominal cramping and nausea. (Beezhold et al. 1996) [281]

        Cinquetti et al. (1995) [304] reported a 3-year-old boy who developed an anaphylactic reaction following banana ingestion and who presented an associated immediate hypersensitivity to latex.

      Skin Prick Test

      • Number of Studies:11-20
      • Food/Type of allergen:

        Pulp extract with PBS ( Fernandez de Corres et al 1993) [327]

        Fresh banana (Rodriguez et al 1993) [492], (Blanco et al 1994) [288] [287], (Mäkinen-Kiljunen 1994) [405], (Alenius et al 1996) [5], (Delbourg et al 1996) [42], (Grob et al. 2002) [600]

        The pulp of banana was extract with NTE 1N solution: NaCl 1mol/L, Tris 0,1mol/lL ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid 0.01mol/L (Lavaud et al 1995) [102]

        A commercial banana extract (Beezhold et al 1996) [281]

        A purified 32-kd banana endochitinase (Mikkola 1998) [418]

        Banana PBS extract; endochitinase-enriched protein preparation and the endochitinase allergens ( Ba1 and Ba2) (Sánchez-Monge et al 1999) [493]

      • Protocol: (controls, definition of positive etc)

        Prick-prick technique. (Mäkinen-Kiljunen 1994) [405]

        The positive results of the tests were designated as follows: + < 1/2; positive surface reference (histamine control: 10 mg/ml), ++ > 1/2; positive reference, +++ > positive reference, and ++++ > twice reference (Lavaud et al 1995) [102].

        Histamine and the diluent were used as positive and negative controls (Beezhold et al 1996) [281]

        A wheal the size of half of that caused by histamine dihydrochloride (10 mg/mL; ALK, Copenhagen, Denmark) or larger was regarded as a positive reaction. (Mikkola 1998) [418]


        Prick by prick. Histamine phosphate (10 mg/ml) and PBS buffer were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. A mean wheal area > 7mm2 developed after puncture was considered as a positive response. (Sánchez-Monge et al 1999) [493]

        Prick by prick. Codeine phosphate (9 %l) and saline solution were used as positive and negative controls, respectively (Delbourg et al. 1996) [42]

      • Number of Patients:

        8 patients with allergy to latex and fruits (Fernandez de Corres et al 1993) [327]

        3 patients with latex hypersensitivity and allergy to fruits (Rodriguez et al 1993) [492]

        25 patients with latex allergy (Blanco et al 1994) [288].

        31 patients with latex allergy (Mäkinen-Kiljunen 1994) [405]

        17 patients with avocado allergy (Blanco et al 1994) [287].

        17 patients with latex allergy. (Lavaud et al 1995) [102]

        22 latex-allergic patients and 22 control subjects with no evidence of allergy to latex or to banana. (Alenius et al 1996) [5].

        19 latex-allergic patients. (Delbourg et al 1996) [42]

        47 latex allergic patients (Beezhold et al 1996) [281]

        4 patients allergic to natural rubber latex (Mikkola et al. 1998) [418]

        15 patients with latex-fruit allergy. (Sánchez-Monge et al 1999) [493]

        4 patients with history of banana allergy but not of latex allergy (Grob et al. 2002) [600]

      • Summary of Results:

        5 out of 8 patients were SPT positive and three negative to banana extract (Fernandez de Corres et al 1993) [327]

        3 patients showed positive SPT responses to banana fruit (Rodriguez et al 1993) [492]

        7 out of 25 patients showed positive SPT to banana fruit (Blanco et al 1994) [288].

        SPT with fresh banana were positive in 11 of 31 (35%) patients with latex allergy tested (Mäkinen-Kiljunen 1994) [405]

        11 out of 17 patients had a positive SPT to banana (Blanco et al 1994) [287]

        6 out of 17 patients had a positive SPT to banana extract (Lavaud et al 1995) [102]

        The banana skin-prick test was positive in 14 out of 18 (78%) latex-allergic patients studied (Alenius et al 1996) [5]

        Banana skin prick tests were positive in 5 out of 14 patients (36%) (Delbourg et al 1996) [42]

        18 out of 47 patients had a positive SPT to banana extracts (Beezhold et al 1996) [281]

        1 out of 4 patients allergic to natural rubber latex had a positive reaction to a 32-kDa banana protein (Mikkola rt al. 1998) [418]

        SPT responses were positive to the crude banana extract in 14/15 patients, to the chitinase-enriched extract in 13/15, to Ba 1 in 8/15 and to Ba 2 in 9/15 (Sánchez-Monge et al 1999) [493]

        SPT was postive for all the patients tested with banana fruit (Grob et al. 2002) [600]

      IgE assay (by RAST, CAP etc)

      • Number of Studies:0
      • Food/Type of allergen:

        The pulp of banana was extract with NTE 1N solution: NaCl 1mol/L, Tris 0,1mol/lL ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid 0.01mol/L (Lavaud et al 1995) [102].

        Banana extracts (Delbourg et al. 1996) [42], (Alenius et al. 1996) [5], (Asero et al. 2003) [582]

        Banana extracts and recombinant banana profilin (Grob et al. 2002) [600]

        Recombinant profilin from banana (Reindl et al. 2002) [601]

      • IgE protocol:

        RAST (Lavaud et al 1995) [102] (Alenius et al. 1996) [5]

        CAP RAST (Delbourg et al. 1996) [42] (Grob et al. 2002) [600] (Asero et al. 2003) [582] (Sánchez-Monge et al 1999) [493]

        EAST (Reindl et al. 2002) [601]

      • Number of Patients:

        19 latex-allergic patients (Delbourg et al. 1996) [42]

        17 latex-allergic patients (Lavaud et al. 1995) [102]

        22 latex-allergic patients and 22 control subjects with no evidence of allergy to latex or to banana (Alenius et al. 1996) [5]

        4 patients with history of banana allergy but not of latex allergy (Grob et al. 2002) [600]

        Reindl et al. (2002) [601] tested 16 sera from subjects with suspected banana allergy

        Asero et al. (2003) [582] studied 71 patients allergic to fruits and vegetables but not sensitized to lipid transfer protein or natural rubber latex

      • Summary of Results:

        Banana RAST results were positive in 12 of the 19 patients (63%) (Delbourg et al. 1996) [42]

        7 out of 17 patients had RAST responses to banana therefore the authors grouped the patients into 2 groups. Group 1 comprised serum samples with only latex allergy (clinical history of latex allergy, no clinical evidence for a fruit allergy, positive prick test and RAST responses to latex, negative responses to fruits). Group 2 comprised serum samples from 10 patients with a latex allergy and a fruit allergy (suggestive symptoms, positive prick test and RAST responses) (Lavaud et al. 1995) [102]

        The banana RAST was positive in 12 out of 14 latex-allergic patients studied (Alenius et al. 1996) [5]

        3 out of 4 patients were IgE-CAP positive (> or = class 2) and two were banana-profilin EAST positive (Grob et al. 2002) [600]

        Reindl et al. (2002) [601] observed that IgE binding to the recombinant profilins was observed in 7/16 sera from subjects with suspected banana allergy (44%)

        Asero et al (2003) [582] found that 24 out of 71 patients were sensitized to Bet v 1, 18 out of 71 patients were sensitized to Bet v 2 (profilin) and 25 out of 71 patients were sensitized to both. Of these 2/24, 12/18 and 9/25 were sensitized to banana. Thus 66% of patients sensitized to Bet v 2 only were sensitized to banana.

        8/15 patients had specific IgE to banana (Sánchez-Monge et al 1999) [493]

      Immunoblotting

      • Immunoblotting separation:

        Proteins were separated on 15% acrylamide SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions (Lavaud et al. 1995) [102]

        Proteins were separated on 12% gel SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions (Delbourg et al. 1996) [42]

        Banana extracts were separated by sodium dodecylsulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) with a 13% polyacrylamide gel (Moller et al. 1998) [115]

        Banana extract was separated by means of SDS-PAGE (15% polyacrylamide gel) under reducing conditions (Grob et al. 2002) [600] and under non reducing conditions (Sanchez Monge et al. 1999) [493]

      • Immunoblotting detection method:

        The proteins were transferred onto a nitrocellulose sheet. The nitrocellulose sheet was blocked with 3% (w/v) skimmed milk and incubated with patient sera (1:100). IgE antibody detection was performed with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-human IgE (1:100) and blots were developed with AP Conjugate Substrate (Lavaud et al. 1995) [102]

        The proteins were transferred onto a nitrocellulose sheets. The nitrocellulose sheet was blocked with 3% (w/v) BSA in PBS (phosphate saline buffer) and incubated with patient sera (1:5). IgE antibody detection was performed with 125I rabbit anti-human IgE (1:2) and blots were autoradiographied (Delbourg et al. 1996) [42]

        Samples were electrotransferred to PVDF (polyvinylidene difluoride) membranes. After washing and blocking membranes were incubated with the pool of sera from allergic patients or with control sera (1 : 3 dilutions), then with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated monoclonal anti-human IgE (1 : 500 dilutions), and finally revealed by adding 5-bromo-4- chloro-3-indolyl phosphate/nitro blue tetrazolium (Sanchez Monge et al. 1999) [493]

        The separated proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes by means of semidry blotting. The membrane was blocked with 0.05 mol/L TRIS-HCl, 0.15 mol/L NaCl, and 0.3% Tween-20 (pH 7.4). Cut nitrocellulose strips were incubated overnight in diluted patient serum (1:6.7). Bound IgE was detected with mouse monoclonal anti-human IgE alkaline phosphatase conjugate (1:750) and subsequent staining with 4-nitroblue tetrazolium chloride and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate (Grob et al. 2002) [600]

      • Immunoblotting results:

        IgE from 9/10 group 2 (fruit and latex allergy) sera reacted to banana proteins. The most important allergen in the extract was at about 30 kDa. A minor band was found at 35 kDa in one serum. Two sera from group 1 (monoallergy to latex) reacted with the 30 kDa protein (Lavaud et al. 1995) [102]

        89% of the patients showed IgE binding to banana extract. IgE binding occurred mainly at 19 kDa (21%, 4/19), 33 kDa (88%, 15/19), 37 kDa (76%, 13/19), 39 kDa (21%, 4/19), and 40 kDa (26%, 5/19) (Delbourg et al. 1996) [42]

        IgE binding to a 40 kDa allergen was observed and proteins with molecular weights of 52, 58, 67, 88 and 94 kDa were detected by three of the four sera (Moller et al. 1998) [115]

        Two bands of 32 and 34 kDa were the major components recognised by sera (Sanchez Monge et al. 1999) [493]

        Two sera reacted strongly with protein at 32 and 34 kDa and a third patient sensitised to avocado and banana but not to pollen or latex reacted to a 70 kDa band. The fourth patient was sensitised to birch pollen but not to latex reacted with recombinant banana profilin (Grob et al. 2002) [600]

      Oral provocation

      • Number of Studies:1-5
      • Food used and oral provocation vehicle:6 g oatmeal, 90 g water, 7 g cocoa powder, 60 g mashed banana, 5 drops banana flavor, 30 g blackberry, 30 g peppermint syrup, 10 g lemon juice and 2 g gelatin. Patients had to keep the pudding in their mouth and spit it out after 1 minute. If they had no symptoms they were asked to swallow the pudding (Grob et al . 2002) [600]
      • Blind:yes
      • Number of Patients:Two patients with a positive SPT to banana and IgE-CAP positive (> or = class 2). These patients were also sensitized (SPT and CAP) to latex, avocado, kiwi, and birch pollen. In both patients banana allergy was confirmed by DBPCFC (Grob et al. 2002) [600]
      • Dose response:Increasing amounts of 5, 10, 20 and 40 g. The smallest amount eliciting objetive symptoms were 2.6 g for one patient and 1.3 g for the other patient (Grob et al. 2002) [600]
      • Symptoms:

        OAS, urticaria and tachycardia (Grob et al. 2002) [600]

      IgE cross-reactivity and Polysensitisation

      IgE cross-reactivity was demonstrated by RAST-inhibition between latex, avocado, chestnut and banana (Blanco et al. 1994) [288]

      The presence of cross-reacting allergens in natural rubber latex and banana has been confirmed by immunoblot inhibition (Alenius et al. 1996) [5], (Lavaud et al. 1995) [102], (Beezhold et al. 1996) [281]

      Cross-reacting IgE antibodies recognizing latex and fruit allergens (papaya, avocado, banana, chestnut, passion fruit, fig, melon, mango, kiwi, pineapple, peach, and tomato) were demonstrated by RAST-inhibition tests on 146 latex-allergic patients and a 30 control without clinical syntoms of latex allergy (Brehler et al. 1997) [292].

      Moller et al. 1998 [115] have found common IgE epitopes in latex, avocado, and banana extracts and two components of 43 and 67 kDa in kiwi fruit by immunoblot inhibition and EAST.

      Banana allergy has been associated with the latex-fruit syndrome being class I chitinases the cross-reactive allergens. In addition, profilin is an important mediator of IgE cross-reactivity between pollen and exotic fruits (Reindl et al. 2002) [601]

      Other Clinical information

      Reviews (0)

        References (17)

        • Asero R, Mistrello G, Roncarolo D, Amato S, Zanoni D, Barocci F, Caldironi G.
          Detection of clinical markers of sensitization to profilin in patients allergic to plant-derived foods.
          J Allergy Clin Immunol. 112(2):427-432. 2003
          PUBMEDID: 12897752
        • Reindl J, Rihs HP, Scheurer S, Wangorsch A, Haustein D, Vieths S
          IgE reactivity to profilin in pollen-sensitized subjects with adverse reactions to banana and pineapple.
          Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 128(2):105-14.. 2002
          PUBMEDID: 12065910
        • Grob M, Reindl J, Vieths S, Wuthrich B, Ballmer-Weber BK.
          Heterogeneity of banana allergy: characterization of allergens in banana-allergic patients.
          Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 89(5):513-6.. 2002
          PUBMEDID: 12452211
        • Sanchez-Monge R, Blanco C, Diaz-Perales A, Collada C, Carrillo T, Aragoncillo A Salcedo G
          Isolation and characterization of major banana allergens: identification as fruit class I chitinases.
          Clin.Exp.Allergy 29: 673-680.. 1999
          PUBMEDID: 10231328
        • Mikkola JH, Alenius H, Kalkkinen N, Turjanmaa K, Palosuo T, Reunala T
          Hevein-like protein domains as a possible cause for allergen cross-reactivity between latex and banana.
          J.Allergy Clin. Immunol. 102: 1005-10012.. 1998
          PUBMEDID: 9847442
        • Beezhold D.H., Sussman G. L., Liss G.M. and Chang N.S.
          Latex allergy can induce clinical reactions to specific foods.
          Clin. Exp. Allergy 26: 416-422.. 1996
          PUBMEDID: 8732238
        • Delbourg MF, Guilloux L, Moneret-Vautrin DA, Ville G
          Hypersensitivity to banana in latex-allergic patients. Identification of two major banana allergens of 33 and 37 kD
          Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 76: 321-326.. 1996
          PUBMEDID: 8612113
        • Alenius H, Makinen-Kiljunen S, Ahlroth M, Turjanmaa K, Reunala T, Palosuo T
          Crossreactivity between allergens in natural rubber latex and banana studied by immunoblot inhibition.
          Clin. Exp. Allergy 26: 341-348.. 1996
          PUBMEDID: 8729673
        • Lavaud F, Prevost A, Cossart C, Guerin L, Bernard J, Kochman S
          Allergy to latex, avocado pear, and banana: Evidence for a 30Kd antigen in immunoblotting.
          J. Allergy Clin Immunol 95: 557-564.. 1995
          PUBMEDID: 7852672
        • Blanco C., Carrillo T., Castillo R., Quiralte J. and Cuevas M.
          Avocado hypersensitivity.
          Allergy 49: 454-459.. 1994
          PUBMEDID: 8074265
        • Makinen-Kiljunen S
          Banana allergy in patients with immediate-type hypersensitivity to natural rubber latex: Characterization of cross-reacting antibodies and allergens.
          J.Allergy Clin. Immunol 93: 990-996.. 1994
          PUBMEDID: 8006321
        • Blanco C., Carrillo T., Castillo R., Quiralte J. and Cuevas M.
          Latex allergy: Clinical features and cross-reactivity with fruits.
          Ann. Allergy 73(4): 309-314.. 1994
          PUBMEDID: 7943998
        • Rodriguez M, Vega F, Garcia MT, Panizo C, Laffond E, Montalvo A, Cuevas M
          Hypersensitivity to latex , chestnut , and banana.
          Ann. Allergy 70: 31-34.. 1993
          PUBMEDID: 7678723
        • Fernandez de Corres L, Moneo I, Munoz D, Bernaola G, Fernandez E, Audicana M, Urrutia I
          Sensitization from chestnuts and bananas in patients with urticaria and anaphylasis from contact with latex.
          Ann. Allergy 70:35-39.. 1993
          PUBMEDID: 7678724
        • Cinquetti M, Peroni D, Vinco A, Zoppi G
          Latex allergy in a child with banana anaphylaxis.
          Acta Paediatr 84: 709-710.. 1995
          PUBMEDID: 7670265
        • Brehler R, Theissen U, Mohr C, Luger T
          "Latex-fruit syndrome": frequency of cross-reacting IgE antibodies.
          Allergy 52: 404-410.. 1997
          PUBMEDID: 9188921
        • Moller M, Kayma M, Vieluf D, Paschke A, Steinhart H
          Determination and characterization of cross-reacting allergens in latex, avocado, banana, and kiwi fruit.
          Allergy 53: 289-296.. 1998
          PUBMEDID: 9542609

        Biochemical Information for Ba 1 and Ba2

        • Allergen Name:Ba 1 and Ba2
        • Alternatve Allergen Names:
        • Allergen Designation:Major
        • Protein Family:

          Chitin recognition protein Pfam PF00187

          Chitinase class I Pfam PF00182

        • Sequence Known?:Yes (partial sequence)
        • Allergen accession No.s:

          AF001524; AAB82773.1; EMBL GenBank
          O22318:Swissprot: http://ca.expasy.org/cgi-bin/niceprot.pl?O22318

        • 3D Structure Accession No.:Not determined
        • Calculated Masses:
        • Experimental Masses:

          30 and 37 kDa (Mikkola et al. 1998) [418]

          32 and 34 kDa (Sanchez-Monge et al. 1999) [493]

          33 and 37 kDa (Delbourg et al. 1996) [42]

          30 kDa (Lavaud et al. 1995) [102]

        • Oligomeric Masses:None
        • Allergen epitopes:Not known
        • Allergen stability:
          Process, chemical, enzymatic:
          Ba 1 and Ba2 are thermolabile allergens (Sanchez-Monge et al. 1999) [493]
        • Nature of main cross-reacting proteins:Ba 1 and Ba2 are panallergens involved in the latex-fruit syndrome. There are cross-reactions with other endochitinases of fruits such as avocado, mango, kiwi, or seeds such as chestnut (Cas s 5, 85%) (Sanchez-Monge et al. 1999 [493]; Moller et al. 1998 [115]) and latex (Alenius et al. 1996 [5]).
        • Allergen properties & biological function:Ba 1 and Ba2 are endochitinases with a possible defence function against plant pathogens and belong to pathogenesis-related proteins family PR3.
        • Allergen purification:

          Banana furits were peeled, freeze-dried, ground and defatted with cold acetone. The residue was extracted with PBS buffer, centrifuged and dialysed against water. The protein preparation was fractionated by affinity-chromatography on a regenerated chitin column equilibrated with 20 mM Tris-HCl. Elution was performed with 20 mM sodium acetate pH 5.5 followed by 20 mM acetic acid pH 3.2 to elute the retained proteins. The later eluate was fractionated by cation exchange chromatography on a Mono S HR 5/5 column equilibrated with 10 mM sodium acetate. Elution was performed with a salt linear gradient of 0-50% of 0.5 M NaCl (Sanchez-Monge et al. 1999) [493]

          Pieces of fresh banana were homogenized with 30% (v/v) acetonitrile (ACN) containing 0.1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). The homogenate was stirred overnight at 4°C and centrifuged at 5000 x g for 30 minutes, and the supernatant was filtered through a 0.45-µm membrane (Millex HV; Millipore, Molsheim, France), concentrated 10-fold under vacuum, and filtered again through a 0.45-µm membrane (Millex HV). To remove pectin, the preparation was chromatographed in an HPLC column (ReSource RPC, 3 mL; Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) by using a linear gradient of ACN (0% to 100% in 15 minutes). Banana proteins were purified by reversed phase chromatography on a ReSource RPC 3 mL column by using a linear gradient of ACN (20% to 60% in 60 minutes) in 0.1% TFA at a flow rate of 1 mL/min (Mikkola et al. 1998) [418]

        • Other biochemical information:

          Amino terminal sequencing revealed that both the 32- and 33-kDa proteins (16 residues analyzed) had 80% identity to the N-terminus of hevein (Mikkola et al. 1998) [418]

        References (6)

        • Moller M, Kayma M, Vieluf D, Paschke A, Steinhart H
          Determination and characterization of cross-reacting allergens in latex, avocado, banana, and kiwi fruit.
          Allergy 53: 289-296.. 1998
          PUBMEDID: 9542609
        • Lavaud F, Prevost A, Cossart C, Guerin L, Bernard J, Kochman S
          Allergy to latex, avocado pear, and banana: Evidence for a 30Kd antigen in immunoblotting.
          J. Allergy Clin Immunol 95: 557-564.. 1995
          PUBMEDID: 7852672
        • Mikkola JH, Alenius H, Kalkkinen N, Turjanmaa K, Palosuo T, Reunala T
          Hevein-like protein domains as a possible cause for allergen cross-reactivity between latex and banana.
          J.Allergy Clin. Immunol. 102: 1005-10012.. 1998
          PUBMEDID: 9847442
        • Sanchez-Monge R, Blanco C, Diaz-Perales A, Collada C, Carrillo T, Aragoncillo A Salcedo G
          Isolation and characterization of major banana allergens: identification as fruit class I chitinases.
          Clin.Exp.Allergy 29: 673-680.. 1999
          PUBMEDID: 10231328
        • Delbourg MF, Guilloux L, Moneret-Vautrin DA, Ville G
          Hypersensitivity to banana in latex-allergic patients. Identification of two major banana allergens of 33 and 37 kD
          Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 76: 321-326.. 1996
          PUBMEDID: 8612113
        • Alenius H, Makinen-Kiljunen S, Ahlroth M, Turjanmaa K, Reunala T, Palosuo T
          Crossreactivity between allergens in natural rubber latex and banana studied by immunoblot inhibition.
          Clin. Exp. Allergy 26: 341-348.. 1996
          PUBMEDID: 8729673

        Biochemical Information for Mus xp 1

        • Allergen Name:Mus xp 1
        • Alternatve Allergen Names:Profilin
        • Allergen Designation:Minor
        • Protein Family:Profilin, Pfam PF00235
        • Sequence Known?:Yes
        • Allergen accession No.s:

          Q94JN3: Swissprot: http://ca.expasy.org/cgi-bin/niceprot.pl?Q94JN3

          AF377948; AAK54834.1; EMBL / GenBank

        • 3D Structure Accession No.:Not determined
        • Calculated Masses:14042 Da
        • Experimental Masses:14 kDa (Reindl et al. 2002) [601]
        • Oligomeric Masses:None
        • Allergen epitopes:Not determined
        • Allergen stability:
          Process, chemical, enzymatic:

          There are only few studies on the stability of profilins most of them on celery profilin. Compared to other allergens, profilin is a moderately stable protein, more resistant than Bet v 1 homologues but less stable than lipid transfer proteins or corss-reactive carbohydrate deteminants of glycoporein allergens.

        • Nature of main cross-reacting proteins:

          High IgE cross-reactivity of banana profilin with birch pollen profilin, Bet v 2, and latex profilin, Hev b 8, was demonstrated by immunoblot inhibition as well as EAST inhibition experiments (Reindl et al. 2002) [601]

        • Allergen properties & biological function:

          Profilin is an actin-binding protein of the cytoskeleton

        • Allergen purification:The recombinant banana profilin was purified by affinity chromatography using poly-(L)-proline as the solid phase and expressed in E. coli. Inhibition experiments indicated similar IgE reactivity of natural and recombinant allergen (Reindl et al. 2002) [601]
        • Other biochemical information:

        References (3)

        • Reindl J, Rihs HP, Scheurer S, Wangorsch A, Haustein D, Vieths S
          IgE reactivity to profilin in pollen-sensitized subjects with adverse reactions to banana and pineapple.
          Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 128(2):105-14.. 2002
          PUBMEDID: 12065910
        • Grob M, Reindl J, Vieths S, Wuthrich B, Ballmer-Weber BK.
          Heterogeneity of banana allergy: characterization of allergens in banana-allergic patients.
          Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 89(5):513-6.. 2002
          PUBMEDID: 12452211
        • Asero R, Mistrello G, Roncarolo D, Amato S, Zanoni D, Barocci F, Caldironi G.
          Detection of clinical markers of sensitization to profilin in patients allergic to plant-derived foods.
          J Allergy Clin Immunol. 112(2):427-432. 2003
          PUBMEDID: 12897752